Development and application of clinical prediction rules to improve decision making in physical therapist practice.
نویسندگان
چکیده
C linical prediction rules (CPRs) are tools designed to improve decision making in clinical practice by assisting practitioners in making a particular diagnosis, establishing a prognosis, or matching patients to optimal interventions based on a parsimonious subset of predictor variables from the history and physical examination.1,2 Clinical prediction rules have been developed to improve decision making for many conditions in medical practice, including the diagnosis of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT),3 strep throat,4 coronary artery disease,5 and pulmonary embolism.6 Clinical prediction rules also have been developed to assist in establishing a prognosis such as determining when to discontinue resuscitative efforts after cardiac arrest in the hospital,7 determining the likelihood of death within 4 years for people with coronary artery disease,7 identifying children who are at risk for developing urinary tract infections,8 and identifying the characteristics of patients who are likely to develop postoperative nausea and vomiting after anesthesia.9
منابع مشابه
A tool for clinical reasoning and reflection using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) framework and patient management model.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Professional development is a cornerstone of physical therapist practice. As the profession moves toward the ideals of Vision 2020, more emphasis is being placed on the process of clinical decision making. Although reflection and mentorship are widely regarded as important instruments to facilitate the progression of clinical reasoning skills, little guidance exists in th...
متن کاملAn integrated framework for decision making in neurologic physical therapist practice.
Decision-making frameworks are used by clinicians to guide patient management, communicate with other health care providers, and educate patients and their families. A number of frameworks have been applied to guide clinical practice, but none are comprehensive in terms of patient management. This article proposes a unifying framework for application to decision making in the management of indi...
متن کاملMitigating Evidentiary Bias in Planning and Policy-Making; Comment on “Reflective Practice: How the World Bank Explored Its Own Biases?”
The field of cognitive psychology has increasingly provided scientific insights to explore how humans are subject to unconscious sources of evidentiary bias, leading to errors that can affect judgement and decision-making. Increasingly these insights are being applied outside the realm of individual decision-making to the collective arena of policy-making as well. A recent editorial in this jou...
متن کاملFactors affecting clinical reasoning of occupational therapists: a qualitative study
Background: Clinical reasoning is generally defined as the numerous modes of thinking that guide clinical practice but little is known about the factors affecting how occupational therapists manage the decision-making process. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the factors influencing the clinical reasoning of occupational therapists. Methods: Twelve occupational therapy pr...
متن کاملبررسی رابطه خودکارآمدی با تصمیم گیری بالینی در پرستاران شاغل در بیمارستانهای شهر بوشهر
Background: The clinical decision-making is a process of critical thinking to choose the best practice to achieve the desired objectives. Nurses in the health system known as one of the important health service providers that clinical decision-making is one of their duties in the field. Therefore, they should have the ability to make appropriate clinical decisions. This study was conducted to a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Physical therapy
دوره 86 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006